There’s still a lot of mixed messaging around whether Louisiana will move forward with a nearly $3 billion project that environmental advocates and experts have said is essential to repairing the state’s eroding coastline.
Republican Gov. Jeff Landry in December said there are “legitimate issues of concerns” tied to the project that are “impossible to ignore.” They include multiple legal challenges, rapidly escalating construction costs and negative impacts on local wildlife and fishing industry.
But the state’s Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority’s 2026 annual plan includes approximately $1.5 billion for construction costs through 2028 for the controversial Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project. The project is funded by the $8 billion-plus settlement Louisiana got from oil giant BP following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
The project broke ground in 2023. It’s designed to reintroduce freshwater and sediment from the Mississippi River into the basin, rebuilding up to 30,000 acres of coastal wetlands over 50 years.
The 150-page proposed spending plan seems to indicate the state intends to follow through with the heavily debated project. Four federal agencies –- the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Interior, Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency — have warned Louisiana is in danger of having to repay the $2.26 billion earmarked for the project if the state did not commit to seeing the project through. The agencies oversee allocation of the Deepwater Horizon settlement.
In a letter to federal authorities, Landry noted his concerns are shared by the five state-level agencies that share authority with the federal government overseeing the use of the BP oil settlement funds — CPRA, the Department of Environmental Quality, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and the Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office.
Landry said the federal trustees don’t speak for the state agencies but that everyone involved remains committed to finding an “amicable resolution” that would allow the project to move forward. He called for more analysis to ensure the project would not have negative impacts to the ecosystem.
In their short response, the four federal trustees noted the project has been extensively studied with “over 13,000 pages of analysis that was compiled primarily by Louisiana scientists and resource managers with the input of thousands of Louisiana citizens.”
